Death of a Salesman Comparisson

Death of a Sales objet dart after rendition and watching Arthur Millers Death of a Salesman, it was clear that on that point were many similarities and differences between the film and the textual matter. some(prenominal) of the actors chosen for roles in the movie jawmed to be in possession of fit Millers portrayal of the temperaments. Between Willy mite confused and lost to Lindas promising concern for Willy they all were presented very easy. However, in the correspond, Willy Loman is portrayed as a man of considerable size while in the film he is a good deal smaller.Although Dustin Hoffman depicts the character of Willy Loman well, he gets so enthralled in the heat of the scene that it some clock makes the listening wonder if Miller intended for Willy to be so dramatic and e driveal. At convictions its overwhelming and even difficult to consider what Hoffman is rangeing. A problem with converting lands or books to motion picture is one cant see pictures that go a long with text. The mind must raise its own pictures of what is being described.The portrayal of Linda Loman on screen was completely different than what I had imagined her to be as while I was reading. I envisioned her to be a little younger and a administer more run-down and tired from dealing with not only Willy and his lost bread and butter but to her two sons and the social issues they pick up as well. I see her to be more distressed. As far as plot goes, the storyline was almost on the button the same in the movie and the play. close to scenes were inter qualifyd, but not so a great deal as to disrupt the development or structure of the story.It also looks as though the director of the film purposely make it appear like the movie was pickings place on a stage, belike to stay true to the fact that above all, Death of a Salesman is a play. I felt like the flashbacks were complete and in the film it visually helped the audience to picture what was going on. In the te xt on the other hand, it was up to the reader to consider when they happened and who all were part of them. I count on the movie adaption of this was done very well showing how Ben wasnt really there and it was just Willys imagination when it came time for a flashback.The writers of the film script did a very good job with guardianship specific lines clear and understandable, keeping in mind that they had to most likely change small things here and there. Overall I found most of the movie compared to the play a success. Between choosing actors who fit their move as though they literally were Willy Loman, type slug Loman, Bernard and so forth, to being spot on with the plot for the most part they were both(prenominal) very similar. Some failures in my feel existed in the movie when comparing to the text as well.Read also pragmatism and Expressionism in Death of a SalesmanWhen reading the play I didnt see Willy and Linda being so touchy feely, as in the kissing and hugging th at went on. in like manner the woman that Willy cheats on Linda with is much younger than I imagined. She is much more corruptive especially with her laughing than as I dictum her to be in the play itself. Lastly, toward the end, Biff seemed in my eyes much more emotional than I saw him to be through the text. I saw more anger and distress preferably of caring about willy and crying that happened in the movie. Overall, yes there were successes and failures when comparing the film to the actual play, but I must say both were quite similar.